by Jon Mell

This is a Headshift blog post by Jon Mell, written on October 20, 2008. It has (3) comments, the latest of which was on October 21, 2008.

Why bother with social software?

Does social software really add value?  Does an Enterprise 2.0 ROI actually exist?  How would you measure it?  Is it just for time wasters (like email, the internet, instant messaging etc.).  During a credit crunch surely employees could be performing more valuable activities?  Social software helps put position yourself to be in the right place at the right time.  The more people know about you, and the more people hear about you, the more likely to are going to be at the forefront of their mind when they, or people you know, are in need of your services.  Social software can become a serendipity lubricant - helping people make connections that give value to both parties at very low cost and, equally importantly, effort.  The problem from an ROI perspective is that the evidence can become very anecdotal.  It is more of a story along the lines of "we would never have won that deal if I hadn't come across John's blog post and realised his services could significantly differentiate our offering".  This is not as measurable as traditional IT solutions where you would be able to say that the manufacturing process has reduced in cost by 25%.  You know how many widgets your factory makes in a month so you can measure the cost benefit, but you don't know how many community interactions your employees are going to make and how successful (or not) they will be.

Anecdotal success stories are therefore really important in social software, and I came across a great one by Tom Critchlow from Distilled on the rewards of engagement.  It's worth a read in its own right, but essentially a comment on someone else's blog leads to an offer to guest author a post which leads to several referrals for opportunities into the UK high street market.  (As an aside, this also shows the value of simply commenting on other people's blogs as a way to raise your own profile, something I often advise people, and do myself when I can't think of something to blog!)

An exact ROI is difficult as you have to take into account the number of comments which do not deliver the same results and the fact that there is no guarantee that any comments will directly result in revenue.  The cost of commenting is almost certainly lower than other marketing or PR activities, so it's even more important to use social software in a credit crunch.  Surely an organisation that takes this approach is better positioned in the stream to take advantage of whatever might come its way.

3 Comments

user-pic

"Social software can become a serendipity lubricant"


WTF?

user-pic

A timely post, particularly in the current economic doom and gloom. I have been thinking about this matter myself in a work context. The more I think about this the more I wonder if this is not so much a matter of an ROI on software, more an ROI on networking. The software can be pretty cheap to install and skin (compared to other enterprise tools) and it is for this reason I think it is reasonable to turn the question on its head.

I think the real cost to business is user engagement and interaction. Perhaps if we framed the question around comparable ROI models for business networking, we might arrive at a truer picture. What is the ROI on business lunches? Alumni tracking? Meetings?

I appreciate that in order to ask these questions, one must assume that social tools have already moved into the commodity category (like heating, lighting, having a PC etc). Of course, not all will be ready to make that leap (and arguably, should not yet be), so the software based challenge will still need to be addressed for now.

user-pic

Thanks Salv - that's a great comment. Larry Hawes blogged recently about how organisations that don't value collaboration will never be swayed by a business case, and those that do won't need one (http://lehawes.wordpress.com/2008/10/20/culture-trumps-roi/)

When I talk about "Social Networking" I make the point that there is nothing in that phrase that demands IT. Business has always been inherently social, you are more likely to do business with people you know than people you don't (check out the post on social software - the basics)

Leave a comment